Biopics Two Ways

Cover of Lillian Russell (Fox Marquee Musicals)

A little time ago my husband and I watched a film that I had brought home from the library. It was a biopic, a dramatized biography. If you are familiar with biopics as a genre, you probably already know that they may or may not have a strong relationship to the facts of the people they are about - so watcher beware: "biopic" does not mean bona fide biography!


This particular biopic, Lillian Russell, starred Alice Faye in the title role with Don Ameche, Henry Fonda, Edward Arnold, and Warren William helping out in supporting roles. And did she ever need help. Here I was, having read all these rave reviews about Lillian Russell being one of the greatest musicals ever made, blah blah blah, and my frown just kept getting fiercer as the minutes on the DVD counter piled up. Now, I haven't had much experience in Alice Faye movies, but I can tell you that after watching this one, I'm not sure I'll accumulate it.  


Apparently, A&E said this of Alice Faye in a documentary: "She rose from the mean streets of New York's Hell's Kitchen to become the most famous singing actress in the world. When the pressures of fame became too much, she had the courage to leave Hollywood on her own terms." That's quite a claim to make, quite a glowing recommendation of talent and magnetism. The most famous singing actress in the world? I dispute this claim. I'll bet you $23.80 (as Nancy Drew would say) that more Joes on the street will recognize the name Judy Garland than Alice Faye. Just sayin'.

Judy Garland

Then there's this (gathered from her IMDB webpage): "She introduced almost twice as many 'Hit Parade' songs in her movies (23) as each of her closest competitors: Judy Garland (13), Betty Grable (12) and Doris Day (12)." Strange.  I admit that I don't know how to go about verifying this claim, so I'll just grant it. I say, "If Alice Faye generated more hits on the Hit Parade, it was because the Parade itself was more of a hit in her time than it was in Grable's and Day's, and because the songs themselves were already good." From the performance I witnessed in Lillian Russell, I can't see that Faye is equipped to make a hit out of any song.


So this is amounting to a very harsh review of Miss Faye's performance. It wasn't going to be until I read all of these claims about her being the best and most famous. I don't want to seem vindictive here, but because of my previous ignorance about Alice Faye I was planning on graciously dismissing her disappointing performance as the result of a bad day or out-of-control B career. If she just didn't have it, I wasn't going to ridicule her for it.  But after seeing the wide acclaim and these praises, I must make some objections.  


Plot

Alice Faye as Lillian Russell

The film is based on the story of Lillian Russell, the (truly) famous musical star who tenaciously pursued fame and sensation at the turn of the century. Lillian is an innocent young woman who longs for a career on the stage and disobeys her suffragette mother to pursue it by singing in Tony Pastor's theater. Immediately upon performing in public for the first time, legions of rich men line up at her door and send her flowers, jewels, and gifts of all kinds. She forgets all about a shy newspaperman (Fonda), who was to be her true love, and marries her pianist/composer, the tight-strung Edward Soloman (Ameche), much to the chagrin of two other rich men who think they are poised to marry her. Soloman botches her London debut by having a fight with the producers, then works himself to death writing an opera for her, literally. So she goes home to the states and is eventually reconciled to her long lost newspaperman, whom she marries.  


Alice Faye turns in a singularly dull and emotionally cardboard performance. She plays the initial innocence well, but misses the ambition, misses the passion, misses the determination, misses the greed, misses the pain of losing a husband, and misses the pluckiness one would imagine she should be expressing. She is a flat actress in a three-dimensional role. Don Ameche is decent, Henry Fonda provides some relief by acting well, and Edward Arnold is fun as Diamond Jim. The real star of the show, however, is Helen Westley, who plays Lillian's spunky grandma.  Her performance is not only enjoyable, but also rich and dynamic.  If you ever watch this film, look for her.


The Truth

The real Lillian Russell

Of course, Lillian Russell bears little resemblance to Lillian Russell.  We can always expect the classic biopics to clean up reality, even if in modern film they fabricate sordid details.  A modern production would gobble this story up, because the real Lillian Russell was as famous for her extravagance and loose living as for her beauty and stage talent. She married four times, but had an appetite for sensation that led her to make use of many more men than that. Her large appetite also extended to food, and she was known to be able to eat as much or more than any man. Her only child, conceived out of wedlock, died after being stuck with a diaper pin by his nanny. The pin apparently punctured the poor little baby's stomach. It is not my impression that Miss Russell suffered much grief.  


Her career, though, was magnificently successful, spanning four decades and unprecedented popularity. So immense was her popularity that her's was the first voice to be carried cross county via a telephone line when Graham Bell introduced long distance service. She also had an interesting second career as a columnist and activist after retiring from the stage. She even went on diplomatic missions. Marie Dressler was quoted as saying of Russell, "I can still recall the rush of pure awe that marked her entrance on the stage. And then the thunderous applause that swept from orchestra to gallery, to the very roof."


Analysis 
What is truly frustrating about this film, however, is not the story, but Miss Faye's inadequacy of voice.  To put it very simply: it is boring. Not bad, not off-key, not terrible, just boring and flat. This sabotages the effect of the entire film.  It is difficult to suspend disbelief and get carried away in her stardom and magnificence when you're not sure how she could have a singing career in the first place.  Add to this my befuddlement about Miss Faye's own personal acclaim as a great singer and I am speechless. 





Did you notice the dull look in her eyes? It's there for the whole film.  


My husband hasn't seen many classic biopics, maybe one other, so by the end of this I was desperate to show him a really good one to make up for it.  My solution to the problem? I'll See You in My Dreams, starring Doris Day, who was apparently so outgunned by Faye on the Hit Parade. When it comes to proven talent and real performance though, there is no comparing Faye to Day.  Rhyme.  Anyway, judge for yourself.





These might help you make a decision too.








My point?  Doris Day knew how to do it, and do it she does in I'll See You in My Dreams.  I think it's a delightful film, and that's more than my bias talking.  Everything about the film, from the direction to the cinematography, has a gentle way of rolling the story along while allowing the audience to enjoy all of its treats for the senses, from the deep shadows in the ragtime room, to the fabulous quality of Day's voice, to the endearing acting of Danny Thomas.  


Plot 

Doris Day as Grace LeBoy Kahn and Danny Thomas
as Gus Kahn

The film tells the story of Gus Kahn, great lyricist of the stage and screen, who put words to a whole age of American music.  From "Pretty Baby" to "It Had to Be You," Kahn penned the lyrics to many of the songs we still recognize as greats today.  His wife, Grace, wrote the music for many of them, too.  This biopic chronicles, with surprising accuracy, the time from Grace and Gus's meeting through their partnership, marriage, separation, reconciliation, and to the end of Gus's career.  It is about a timid guy who can't quite seem to say "I love you" unless it's through a song, and the strong woman who made and then almost destroyed his career unwittingly.  It introduces themes of leadership in the home, raises questions about the line to be drawn between pushing someone toward greatness and controlling his life, and delicately expresses the importance of those three little words.  It is more than entertainment, it is interesting. 


I encourage everyone to give it a spin sometime. 


Basics
Directed by Michael Curtiz (also director of Doris's first film, Romance on the High Seas) and supported by greats like Frank Lovejoy, Patrice Wymore, James Gleason, and Mary Wickes, it is well worth the 110 minutes it takes.  


And then tell me, am I right or am I wrong?


(you are also more than welcome to defend Alice Faye if you so choose)

Related articles by Zemanta

• Ronald Reagan Gets a Big-Screen Biopic (cinematical.com)

The Tin Star

Image via Wikipedia

I recently realized that of all the major film genres out there, "Western" is just about the only one that has not been featured on Reel Revival yet.  My husband and I decided to correct that by watching The Tin Star, a Western that I remembered as being very good (and the one closest to the top of the heap in the video bins).  We were not disappointed. 


Let's get right down to basics...
Filmed in 1957 and directed by Anthony Mann (Spartacus, The Naked Spur, The Man From Laramie, among many others), The Tin Star stars (haha) a 52 year old Henry Fonda and a 25 year old Anthony Perkins in only his fourth significant film role.  Lee Van Cleef is also featured as one of the bad guys.   The Tin Star was nominated for a Best Writing Oscar and was filmed out of Paramount Studios at a running time of 93 minutes.  


The Plot
Morgan Hickman (Fonda), a bounty hunter, rides into town to turn in the body of a wanted outlaw and collect his reward.  He is not welcome in town, but he won't leave until he gets what is coming to him.  The man in charge of reimbursing him is Ben Owens (Perkins), the young sheriff who has a good heart but is woefully unprepared for his dangerous job.  Case in point below.

Hickman has to spend a day or so in this town, which is troubled by bullies who push the young sheriff around and self-righteous town leaders who have him under their thumb. In the time that Hickman spends there his life undergoes remarkable changes as he forges relationships with the most unlikely people: a "half breed" boy and his mother, town outcasts, and the young sheriff himself, who is tired of being walked on.  


The result of those relationships also changes that dusty town for good.  


The Highs

• This film, like many of the great Westerns, was filmed in black and white. There is a beautiful, dusty quality to the film here that can't be found in those done in Technicolor.  
• We get some very good performances out of the actors here, particularly Henry Fonda, who teases the depth of character and emotion out of the Hickman character.  At this point in his career, Fonda was not interested in doing more Westerns - he was 52 and felt that  his Western days were over - but he ended up accepting the role because he saw the potential for expression in the character. 
• Suspense.  This film is not cliche.  Even if you feel yourself able to predict what will happen next most of the time, the staging and acting will make you a little nervous.  There are some perilous twists and turns that had me wincing.  
• Relationships.  This film isn't about gunfights and stand-downs, though there are plenty of them; it is about people.  The human interest of the film comes through those black and whites colorfully (haha).  

The Lows

• Physically, Fonda does not fit his character to a T.  His characteristic droopiness about the shoulders and back amplified as he aged, and at times he doesn't look straight and strong enough to be a world-wise'nd bounty hunter.  And he doesn't really swing his arms when he walks, which makes his gait a bit amusing.  But these are merely technicalities. 
• I can't think of anything else to say to this effect. 

Conclusion

The Tin Star is not among the most frequently mentioned or well known Westerns, and I think that is because it has been overlooked.  It is a quiet film but it packs a punch, and it is well worth the 93 minutes it runs.  

Find the Film
Check your local library.  Netflix carries it and Amazon has it for only $6.55.